From a great Dan Oshinsky LinkedIn post on email metrics:

What does a good click-to-open metric look like? In 2023, ConvertKit said the average CTOR was 9.2%, while Mailerlite said their average was 8.9%. If you’re beating those numbers, that’s a very positive sign!

Click-to-open is an underrated metric.


In The Abstract: Effectives of Limited Time Promos in Online Retail

The paper Examining the Efficacy of Time Scarcity Marketing Promotions in Online Retail from the Journal of Marketing Research has some great research (as covered on the Nudge Podcast).

Even the abstract is informative, if a bit unwieldy in that classically academic way:

Time scarcity promotions (e.g., “40% off for a limited time”) are mainstays of online retail marketing. Although positive effects of time scarcity promotions on consumer interest have been evidenced in the brick-and-mortar world, should retailers expect similarly robust effects online? The present research suggests the answer may be no. First, the authors report meta-analytic and experimental results suggesting that previously identified positive effects of time scarcity promotions observed offline may not emerge in online shopping contexts. Then, consistent with the prediction that online time scarcity promotions activate more persuasion knowledge than identical control promotions, the authors detail findings suggesting that providing retailer-exogeneous justifications for online time scarcity promotions’ time restriction (e.g., consumers’ birthdays, seasonal changes) can increase the potential of observing positive effects on consumer interest online. Further, results suggest that the positive effects of including exogenous time justification may be more likely when less time remains until the online promotion’s expiration. However, results stop short of suggesting that online time scarcity promotions will consistently yield superior outcomes compared with identical online control promotions. Therefore, the authors highlight the continued need for careful managerial use as well as further research examining the optimal translation of offline tactics to online retail.

I will now try to translate this into actual human speak, line by line…


Limited time promos / flash sales are popular with ecommerce.

These types of offers have proven success in brick-and-mortar / offline retail, but does that transfer online?

Spoiler alert: probably not.

This is based on a review of pervious research.

Providing a reason for the promo’s limited run can boost the offer’s performance online (e.g., holidays, celebrations, seasons, etc).

This can be boosted further by shortening the offer’s time frame (e.g. 24 hours only).

But these steps won’t make them super promos when compared to other offer types you might run.

We recommend you use these carefully. And more research is needed on the performance of offline tactics for ecomm.


A few guesses as to why flash sales and limited time promos aren’t as effective online:

  • Offline limited time promos have the added constraint of physical presence / travel. There may be 3 days left on a sale, but can you get back to this store in the next 3 days? Our brains might even process the sale as being positive ROI on our time investment that got us into that store (unsubstantiated hypothesis).
  • Snaps and Stories may have altered the timeline of the internet to 24 hours. Anything longer than one solar day is no longer urgent.
  • The internet is an infinite shelf of content, decisions are made in terms of “should I do this now?” 72 hours left in a sale means it doesn’t need to be shopped RIGHT NOW, and is then likely to be forgotten before the expiration date.
  • Grounding the promo in something outside the feed or brand’s business goals can stand out as a hook. “25% for 24 hours” doesn’t have a hook (discounts and promos are ubiquitous now, they aren’t hooks in and of themselves). “25% off on your birthday” might trigger “I should treat myself.' “Spring Sale - 25% off” might trigger “I could use some pieces to freshen things up.”

The New York Times is reportedly developing a generative AI tool to enhance ad targeting. The national daily newspaper is experimenting with several large language models (LLMs) to power the new tool, which will be capable of matching ads with ideal consumers based on their interests, goals, and opinions.

AI will turbocharge contextual advertising.

via Inside

note: I did not find reference to advertising in The Verge article Inside cited. So I don’t know where the above claim is really from, but it does make sense.


Quick Hit Google Bits

Google Analytics 4 launches new trend detection insight

trend change detection focuses on slower changes happening over a longer time. This gives users a detailed view of data changes, making it a useful tool to spot both quick and long-term trends.

GA4 is introducing two dedicated spaces – one for marketers to track and analyze campaigns, and another for behavioral insights.

  • The Reports section provides insights into how users engage with your websites and apps so you can improve your product and user experience.
  • The Advertising section will become the hub to monitor and analyze your campaigns whether you’re a publisher or an advertiser.

Reddit signs AI content licensing deal with Google

reportedly paying Reddit $60 million per year to train its artificial intelligence models (e.g., Gemini).


Walmart on its reported (and now confirmed) interest in buying Vizio:

We believe VIZIO’s customer-centric operating system provides great viewing experiences at attractive price points. We also believe it enables a profitable advertising business that is rapidly scaling. Our media business, Walmart Connect, is helping brands create meaningful connections with the millions of customers who shop with us each week. We believe the combination of these two businesses would be impactful as we redefine the intersection of retail and entertainment.

via Walmart