⃛Level Up ↴
This highlights the difference between “creative” as a noun and “creative” as an adjective.
A creative piece of creative stands out in a sea of uncreative pieces of creative.
via Edward Cotton
It’s no so much the tariffs themselves (though they’re certainly not helping, especially for anyone relying on goods from China), but the uncertainty about what, when, and how much that is wreaking havoc on planning right now.
Some large companies are refusing to even give guidance in earnings reports because it’s a fool’s errand.
The supply chain signals are clear though:
the CEOs of Target, Walmart, and Home Depot convened with the president to warn that supply chain disruptions caused by tariffs will lead to notable product shortages in their stores within just a couple of weeks
Freight company HLS Group told clients earlier this month that it has already recorded 80 cancelled vessels out of China as tariffs crunch demand
Here’s how the DOJ & friends want Google to break up its search monopoly:
- No more paying for default status (this was the obvious ask)
- Get rid of Chrome
- Open source the data—queries, coverage, performance, etc
If it’s still a monopoly in 5 years, Android could be on the chopping block.
The advertising remedies are kind of weird…
- Provide more information to advertisers in search query reports
- Let advertisers opt out of broad and automated keyword matching.
On the first one, sure, whatever.
But on the second, feels like advertisers refusing to change and wanting their old toys back.
Have a podcast and not seeing much growth?
Try these tips from Grow the Show:
Completion rate < 65-75%?
Keep tinkering with your intros and your content and the promise that each episode makes
Downloads stalled?
Keep tinkering with your promotion efforts
Experiment with post formats and styles
YouTube views < 💯?
You need to change your titles and thumbnails
The behavior change Manton outlines here is one I find myself mirroring
I’m now asking AI for simple queries that Google would be equally good for. Using AI essentially automates the workflow of getting 10 links from Google, clicking on 3-4 of them, then skimming the web pages to get your answer.
Getting links in the response plays a part for me.
I imagine this will become more common.
The point isn’t going viral. Unless your business is monetizing the hamster wheel.
As Gabe the Bass Player says:
But the point isn’t to just attract a crowd.
We want to attract a crowd doing our specific thing.
We want a crowd that is attracted to what we do.
We want what we do to serve the expectations wrapped up in that attraction.
Attention is a means, not an end.
Indexing on attention leads to clickbait, which is the act of breaking the promise of expectation.
Never a good move for a business.
Social media is a discovery > demand creation channel. In a fragmented QVC / infomercial kind of way.
It’s about educating people on your product / service, sharing what other people say about it, and building your community.
To turn social discovery into sales, marketers should focus on authentic, useful content—think creator reviews, demos, and clear product info. Pair that with well-timed discounts and engaging video formats to nudge shoppers from interest to action.
Post the content that builds the reputation you want to have.
via EMARKETER
Good marketing happens when the narrative a brand tells about itself aligns with the narrative customer is telling themselves.
Typically this occurs in the realm of identity, but local / locally rooted businesses cultivate a sense of ownership and pride amongst the locals. Meaning local conditions impact narrative overlap.
This is a perfect illustration.
Rodney Brooks predicts a potential future for genAI
LLMs that can explain which data led to what outputs will be key to non annoying/dangerous/stupid deployments. They will be surrounded by lots of mechanism to keep them boxed in, and those mechanisms, not yet invented for most applications, will be where the arms races occur.
This seems the sensible requirement for truly broad adoption and use across industries and situations.
The current ecosystem is more accelerator than substitute.
It’s not always our expectation of success that’s proven wrong, it’s our expectation of timeframe that’s usually the problem.
Deployment at scale takes so much longer than anyone ever imagines. If you see someone with a new technology that is a barely working lab demo with six PhD students baby-sitting it behind the scenes, and the they say it is going to change the world in two years, just laugh.
Promising results on a miraculous timeframe is setting yourself up for uncomfy convos later.
via Rodney Brooks
About that pull forward induced analysis trap…
From The Fed:
Import growth was strong relative to its fourth-quarter pace, consistent with reports that some U.S. importers were stocking up ahead of prospective tariff increases.
Some good news buried in all the tariff whiplash
The CPI dropped 0.1% in March (gas dropped 6.3%)
All items less food and energy is the lowest it’s been since 2021
The Fed’s not celebrating though
From the recent meeting:
participants remarked that uncertainty about the net effect of an array of government policies on the economic outlook was high, making it appropriate to take a cautious approach. Emphasizing that uncertainty, a majority of participants noted the potential for inflationary effects arising from various factors to be more persistent than they projected.
My own personal Siri?
Apple Inc. will begin analyzing data on customers’ devices in a bid to improve its artificial intelligence platform
The goal is to check how well the synthetic training data did while preserving privacy.
But this could be the foundation for AI models that become personalized to each user based on use, patterns, and on-device profiles.
Like ChatGPT remembering your chats, but based on your Apple device usage.
Edge AI—like XR glasses—is nothing but exciting potential right now.
via Bloomberg
The hits keep on coming for Google
Google created an illegal monopoly in the online advertising industry, a Federal judge ruled
According to the ruling, Big G pulled some anticompetitive shenanigans with ad servers and exchanges, and hurt publishers and users by doing so.
The Department of Justice argued that through acquisitions and anticompetitive conduct, Google seized control of the full advertising technology stack: the tools advertisers and publishers buy and sell ads and the exchange that connects them.
An appeal is coming.
via MarTech
The China tariffs are changing the ecommerce landscape in the US as the major players grapple with increased costs.
Temu and Shein have already cut average daily spending on social media platforms by 31% and 19% in the past 30 days
Temu backed out of Google Shopping entirely.
Auction pressure is going to be a lot different for advertisers.
Recent related tariff posts: analysis trap | ad spend impact
via The Daily Upside
The tea leaves are still swirling, but early reads aren’t great, Bob
A February survey of ad executives by trade group Interactive Advertising Bureau found a full 60% of respondents are projecting as much as a 10% reduction in ad budgets this year.
a recession could cause $45 billion in lost advertising, with promoters shifting from traditional television spots toward direct response channels.
The math is simple. Tariffs = higher prices = less budget for non-purchasing activities (like marketing or discretionary spending)
Related to yesterday’s post
via The Daily Upside
There’s a potential analysis trap brewing as businesses see decent sales / revenue performance to start the year.
Highly likely this is pull-forward spending as consumers try to beat tariffs.
Embrace the boring stuff.
Internally, people usually want to do the flashy, exciting stuff. But boring keeps the lights on (and typically has a longer shelf life).
Externally, what’s boring to you is interesting to others. Because they aren’t in it every day like you are. Your boring is the hook.