Unless what you’re selling is solely aimed at the base of Maslow’s pyramid then the purchase decision is an emotional one.

We are creatures of story. How your brand furthers, amplifies, or enhances the consumer’s personal story is the decision matrix.

via Gallup

Screenshot of the post Customer Brand Preference and Decisions: Gallup's 70/30 Principle that shows customer brand and preference decisions are 70% emotional and 30% rational

Machine in the Ghost

Perplexity finally found its social network…kind of.

The Google-but-AI search engine inked a deal with Snapchat to be it’s in-app AI answer engine. For the low, low price of $400 million.

Starting in early 2026, Perplexity will appear in the popular Chat interface for Snapchatters around the world. Through this integration, Perplexity’s AI-powered answer engine will let Snapchatters ask questions and get clear, conversational answers drawn from verifiable sources, all within Snapchat.

Perplexity has been following the Google playbook and this is straight from the pay-for-default-status section.

The announcement noted:

Revenue from the partnership is expected to begin contributing in 2026.

I’m interested what the plan is to create that revenue. Snap has the most successful membership option of any social media platform. Will Perplexity Pro be added in?

Will this lay the groundwork for Snapchat Search Ads (a la TikTok)?

Will Perplexity function as a new data source for targeting and get a revenue share?

Similar to My AI, Snapchatter messages sent to Perplexity will help enhance personalization on Snapchat.

On the face of it, it’s a weird fit. But both platforms fill a similar role in their respective industries, not the main characters but also not nameless extras.


Love this Why People Buy pyramid.

It aligns with a messaging framework I like to use for clients.

The best marketing has messaging for each level, acknowledging that people are looking for different things at different times.

Developing this for your brand would not be a waste of time.

Scheafer’s Why People Buy pyramid graphic. It says: Consumer psychology framework that categorizes purchasing motivations into four levels:&10;1) Basic Needs&10;2) Emotional Value&10;3) Personal Growth&10;4) Social Impact.&10;It explains why consumers choose food products.&10;Ranging from basic needs like taste and convenience to deeper drivers like nostalgia, health transformation, and ethical values. This structured approach helps brands align their messaging and marketing strategies with the true reasons behind consumer behavior. With examples in a pyramid graphic for each level. Examples, basic = reduces effort, emotional = nostaliga, growth = personal identity, impact = beyond self

SEO 4 AI is Just SEO

SEO 4 AI is the buzzy topic of the moment (with the acronym collection to prove it). But is it any different from normal SEO?

Nope!

Thanks for reading…

In case that’s not enough for you, here’s what a founder in the space has to say about it.

But first!

Why listen to what I’m about to copy-paste below? These are the reasons why Lorelight shut down.

What is Lorelight?
According to its about page:

a generative engine optimization (GEO) platform to help businesses track their brand mentions in AI search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity.

Back to the point of all this, SEO 4 AI is just SEO.

Straight from the Lorelight shut down post (bolding is mine):

After analyzing hundreds of queries across ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, I found that brands with high AI search visibility all had the same characteristics:

  • Quality content that genuinely helped people
  • Mentions in authoritative publications
  • Strong reputation in their space
  • Genuine expertise and thought leadership

Sound familiar?

It should. Because it’s the exact same stuff that’s always worked for SEO, PR, and brand building.

There was no secret formula. No hidden hack. No special optimization technique that only applied to AI.

The AI models are trained on the same content that builds your brand everywhere else. They cite the same authoritative sources. They reference the same trusted publications.

There’s no such thing as “GEO strategy” or “AI optimization” separate from brand building. At least not for the vast majority of brands.

Focusing on AI tactics or SEO tactics or social algorithm hacks is a distraction. You’re building on rented land with a lease that can change at a moment’s notice.

Focus on what you can control and own.
Your brand.
Your channels.
Your story.

Everything else is an amplifier. Amps need inputs.

The internet is word of mouth with a steroid problem.

Co-create your brand with your audience.


Creative became the new targeting. Now, creative velocity is becoming the performance bottleneck.

It started with TikTok, where it was said creative had a 72 hour lifespan. Now Meta wants more, more, more

According to Foxwell Digital, best practice is now:

Every five to seven days, refresh your ad set with 5–10 new creatives that look and feel different.

The other implication of that post is partner or die. If you’re not running partnership ads, what’s even the point? (is inferred)

I say: follow your metrics (outside of Meta). Make your ads work for you, don’t work for your ads.